Thursday
Source: PTI News
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: The article covers AAP’s criticism of the BJP over the bungalow controversy involving Delhi CM Atishi. It presents both sides, with AAP sharing images to show their version of the incident and BJP's rebuttal, without overt bias toward any party.
Source: The Indian Express
Bias Rating: -1 (Left-leaning)
Summary: This source might provide more detailed coverage on AAP’s arguments and frame BJP’s response with a critical lens, possibly highlighting challenges faced by AAP amidst political battles.
Source: Times Now
Bias Rating: +1 (Right-leaning)
Summary: This outlet may emphasize BJP's stance, focusing on the party's counterarguments and presenting AAP’s claims as politically motivated or diversionary tactics.
Source: Free Press Journal
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: This article reports on Omar Abdullah’s National Conference (NC) gaining support from four independent MLAs, achieving a majority in the J&K assembly without needing Congress. The article stays factual and presents the situation without notable bias, focusing on the political dynamics and the impact of independents' support.
Source: The Wire
Bias Rating: -2 (Left-leaning)
Summary: The Wire could frame this development more critically, possibly highlighting issues related to regional autonomy and the NC's past stances, while being more sympathetic to parties opposing the BJP.
Source: Republic World
Bias Rating: +2 (Right-leaning)
Summary: Republic World might focus on how NC’s rise could impact BJP's position in Jammu & Kashmir, framing the situation in a way that stresses the challenges NC faces and the larger nationalistic concerns involving the region.
Source: News18
Bias Rating: +1 (Right-leaning)
Summary: This article highlights the absence of Kumari Selja and Randeep Surjewala from a post-election review meeting, suggesting internal rifts within the Congress party. It frames the loss in a way that subtly emphasizes the party’s disarray, which can be interpreted as slightly critical of Congress.
Source: The Hindu
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: The Hindu may focus on reporting the facts without implying internal divisions in Congress, providing a balanced account of the review meeting and highlighting the party's introspection over the loss.
Source: OpIndia
Bias Rating: +3 (Right-leaning)
Summary: OpIndia is likely to be more critical, emphasizing Congress’s inability to maintain unity or strong leadership in Haryana. It might frame the article with stronger language indicating Congress’s failure.
Source: The Hindu
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: This source may offer a factual account of Savitri Jindal's support for the BJP, focusing on her statement about Hisar's development without taking a political stance.
Source: India Today
Bias Rating: -1 (Left-leaning)
Summary: India Today may present this news while highlighting potential political motivations behind Jindal’s decision and any broader implications for Haryana’s politics, offering a slightly critical view.
Source: OpIndia
Bias Rating: +3 (Right-leaning)
Summary: OpIndia may frame this news positively for the BJP, portraying it as a smart move by Jindal to align with the ruling party, emphasizing her development agenda for Hisar.
Source: The Hindu
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: This source might cover PM Modi’s speech by focusing on the factual aspects of the event, highlighting the projects launched and his remarks on the Congress, without leaning towards or against any political party.
Source: NDTV
Bias Rating: -2 (Left-leaning)
Summary: NDTV may emphasize potential criticisms of Modi’s statements on Congress, presenting the news with a focus on political opposition or providing reactions from Congress leaders.
Source: OpIndia
Bias Rating: +3 (Right-leaning)
Summary: OpIndia might present Modi’s remarks positively, praising his initiatives and portraying the Congress’s alleged failures as significant, aligning with the narrative of BJP's success and leadership.
Source: The News Minute
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: This source might provide an informative, neutral account of Chandrababu Naidu’s proposal for a bullet train connecting Amaravati, Chennai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad, detailing the strategic benefits of the project without any overt political slant.
Source: The Wire
Bias Rating: -3 (Left-leaning)
Summary: The Wire may focus on potential criticisms or concerns around the financial and logistical feasibility of the project, possibly highlighting opposition reactions or socio-economic challenges.
Source: Republic World
Bias Rating: +3 (Right-leaning)
Summary: Republic World might emphasize the visionary aspects of Naidu’s proposal, framing it as a forward-looking initiative that aligns with broader development goals and portrays it positively in relation to national progress.
Source: Hindustan Times
Bias Rating: 0 (Neutral)
Summary: The Hindustan Times provides a factual report on PM Modi's emphasis on the importance of India-ASEAN relations amidst global conflicts, focusing on diplomatic aspects without any apparent bias.
Source: The Economic Times
Bias Rating: +1 (Slightly Right-leaning)
Summary: The Economic Times may highlight the positive implications of Modi's statement for India's foreign policy, potentially framing it in a way that supports the current government's initiatives.
Source: The Wire
Bias Rating: -2 (Left-leaning)
Summary: The Wire might provide a critical perspective, analyzing the broader context of Modi's remarks within ongoing global tensions and scrutinizing the effectiveness of India-ASEAN ties.